|
ACTION PLAN |
|
Evidence of Need from/for Self-Study |
Action/Strategy |
Means/Assistance Required |
Evaluation and Expected
Results |
|
1. Achievement:
Infoworks
2002 10th grade state
assessments: |
|
|
• 38% proficiency
in Math Skilss |
|
|
|
• 21% proficiency
in Math Concepts |
|
|
|
• 19% proficiency
in Problem Solving |
|
|
1. Increase the frequency with
which teachers work together on
integrative instruction - so that we move
from once a year to several times a year
by 03 and several times a year to
quarterly by 04 - Chart SF-C.1.1 |
|
|
• 78% of teachers
report that lack of adequate team planning
time is at least a minor problem -
Chart SF-I.3 (1 of 2) |
|
|
|
Increase the number of integrated thematic
units with a focus on MATH skill
development so that 15% of all
units focus on math by 03 and 25%
of all units by 04 -
Chart SF-C.2 (2 of 2) |
|
| 1.
Increase the time that teachers have to
meet and work together. |
|
|
|
Provide professional development to
increase teacher skills in working
together/ teaming, math instruction, and
working collaboratively integrated units |
|
| 1.
Increases in the levels of practices of
teachers working together and individually
on standards-related charts as specified
in the action strategy
Chart SF-C.1.1 |
|
|
Gains on district and statewide
assessments |
|
|
|
Increase in number of integrated thematic
units as specified in action strategy
Chart SF-C.2 (2 of 2) |
|
|
Higher frequencies of teacher
participation in professional development
activities as specified in means required
-
Chart SF-G.1 |
|
| 2.
High level math courses students
are taking/ have taken: |
|
|
|
• over 25% of high
school seniors have not taken Algebra I, Algebra II,
and/ or Geometry |
|
|
|
• over 70% of high
school seniors have not taken
Trigonometry, Pre-calculus, or Calculus -
Chart ST-H-E.4 |
|
| 2.
Increase standards-based practices for
numeracy from several times a month
to weekly by 03 and from weekly
to several times a week by 04 -
SF-D.1 (4 of 4) |
|
|
|
Increase practices for mathematical
reasoning and skill enhancement across the
curriculum from several times a month to
weekly by 02 and from weekly to several
times a week by 03 -
Chart SF- D.1.10 |
|
| 2.
Provide professional development in:
standards-based curricula and assessment,
developmentally appropriate instructional
methods, inquiry or problem centered
learning, and enrichment activities for
students in content areas* |
|
|
| *These
4 professional development activities rank
in the top 12 most wanted by high school
teachers-
Chart SF-G.2 (1 of 2) |
|
|
2. Gains in the
number of high school seniors who are taking
or have taken high level math courses -
Chart ST-H-E.5 |
|
|
Increases in the levels of standards-based
practices for numeracy as specified in the
action strategy -
SF-D.1 (4 of 4) |
|
|
|
Increases in practices for mathematical
reasoning and skill enhancement across
curriculum as specified in action strategy -
Chart SF- D.1.10 |
|
|
3. Climate: High school students report
that "positive school climate experiences" occur
only sometimes, and that "teachers provide
support" sometimes -
Chart ST-H-C.1 (1 of 2) |
| 3.
Create smaller, personalized
communities of learners: |
|
|
|
• 79% of teachers
report that "Lack of school flexibility
for regrouping students or modifying the
length of periods" is at least a
minor
problem-
Chart SF-I.3 (1 of 2) |
|
| 3.
Reorganization and restructuring of daily
schedule. Create small teams of students
and implement a flexible block schedule. |
|
|
|
Increase planning time for team teachers
and provide professional development on
curriculum integration. |
|
| 3.
Increases in student perceptions of
climate: "Positive school climate
experiences" from sometimes to
most of the time by 03 and always by 04.
“Teachers provide support” from
sometimes to most of the time
by 03 and from most of the time to
always by 04.Chart ST-H-C.1 (1 of 2) |
|
|
|
Decrease by 10% annually in the numbers of
teachers who report that "Lack of school
flexibility for regrouping students or
modifying the length of periods" is a
minor, moderate, or major problem - Chart SF- I.3 (1 of 2) |
|
|
4. Expectations: Teachers expect that
only 62% of students overall will attend at least a
four-year college -
Chart TR- B.4 |
|
|
|
Students perceive that their teachers have
lower expectations for them than they do
for themselves:
|
|
|
|
• 78% think they
will definitely go to college |
| |
|
• 69% believe that
their teachers think they will go to
college -
Chart ST-H- D.1 |
| |
|
Students perceive that teachers
consistently have lower expectations for
them than parents and themselves -
Chart ST-H-D.2 |
|
| 4.
Increase frequency of instructional
strategies that clearly outline what
students are supposed to know and be able
to do, to increase students’ sense of
mastery and efficacy -
Chart SF-D.1.9 |
| |
|
Example strategies/increase: |
| |
|
• "students
receive recognition for exemplary work" to
several times a month by 03 and weekly
by 04 |
| |
|
• “students are
given multiple opportunities to improve their grades”
to several times a week by 03 and daily
by 04 |
| |
|
• “student
feedback on how to improve class is sought” to
several times a month by 03 and weekly by
04 |
|
|
4. Professional development to increase
teacher skills in communicating expectations and
efficacy to students in areas such as those
specified in the action strategy. |
|
|
| Lower
teacher-student ratio. |
|
| 4.
Increases
in the number of students across grade
levels that teachers believe will graduate
from a four year college: 62% to
70% by 03, 70% to 80% by
04 -
Chart TR-B.4 |
| |
|
Increase by 10% annually the percentage of
students who believe that they will attend
college (i.e. 88% by 03) and by 10%
annually the percentage who believe that
their teachers think they will attend
college (i.e. 79% by 04) -
Chart ST-H-D.1 |
| |
|
Increases in instructional strategies that
clearly outline what students are supposed
to know and be able to do, to increase
students’ sense of mastery and efficacy -
SF-D.1.9 |
|
| 5.
Support at school: |
|
|
|
Students experience low levels of support: |
|
|
|
• approx. 28% of
students "never" or "hardly ever" have
someone to talk to at school about
academic problems |
|
|
|
• approx. 64%
report that they “never” or “hardly ever” have someone
to talk to at school about personal or family problems
-
Chart ST-H-C.5 |
|
|
|
5. Provide professional development in
teacher-led advisory. During the 2001-02 school
year, high school teachers received little or
no
training in advisory practices -
Chart SF-G.2 (2 of 2) |
|
|
5. Decreases in the numbers of students
who report “never” or “hardly ever” having
someone to talk to regarding academic and
personal/ family problems by 10% annually (i.e.
18% and 54% by 03) -
Chart ST-H-C.5 |
|
|
|
Increases in the implementation of
teacher-led advisory practices as
specified in action strategy -
Chart SF- F.1 (1 of 2) and
Chart SF- F.1 (2 of 2) |
| |
|
Increase amount of professional
development on teacher led advisory: from
no/little to moderate amount by 03 and
from moderate amount to much by 04 -
Chart SF-G.2 (2 of 2) |
|